The Illusion of Solid Ground
Your strategic playbook is obsolete. Not because your execution failed, but because the ground beneath it shifted.
Traditional strategy assumes a firm base to build upon. But today, even infrastructure moves.
With each breakthrough, layers of the technology stack can be commoditized, automated, or entirely replaced overnight. Your relevance isn’t based on what you build, but where and when you build it.
We need a new model: a way to think not in fixed plans, but in shifting terrain.
Enter the Pyramid of Change—a dynamic framework where technologies, platforms, and protocols evolve at different speeds and intensities. Here, strategy isn’t a blueprint—it’s situational awareness.

A Living Terrain
Imagine the technology landscape as a pyramid composed of many layers, each representing a technology, pattern, or institutional form. These layers don’t evolve uniformly—some stabilize over decades, others emerge and collapse within weeks. To navigate this terrain, we group layers into three broad segments:
Base
Foundation
- Decades of stability, institutional momentum.
- High switching costs, regulatory oversight, network effects
- TCP/IP, POSIX standards, cryptographic primitives, legal frameworks, banking.
Middle
Platform
- Yearly cycles, predictable evolution.
- Standardization, vendor consolidation, enterprise adoption.
- Kubernetes, cloud platforms, SaaS suites, programming frameworks
Apex
Frontier
- Monthly transformation, high-experiment velocity
- Rapid prototyping, high failure rates, breakthrough potential
- Latest AI model wrappers, viral applications, experimental developer tools
These segments are heuristic, not rigid. Over time, a technology once at the apex may descend to the middle. The pyramid is constantly in flux—layers shift, compress, or descend based on factors such as adoption, standardization, and market forces.
The Entropy Problem
As the apex rises with new innovations, it exerts pressure on everything beneath it. However, unlike natural systems that tend to simplify, technology tends to accumulate complexity. Legacy code, abandoned APIs, and obsolete practices accumulate at the base, creating foundational entropy—technical debt that compounds over time. Competitive advantage is increasingly found in managing this entropy. Smart organizations conduct regular “archeological audits” to deprecate, consolidate, and offload legacy layers. They approach building with a mindset of subtraction, not just addition.
Strategic Movements
Ascend
Ride the Wave
- Pushing into volatile, fast-moving layers
- High risk, high return on speed, and novelty
- Having high risk tolerance, rapid execution capabilities, and able to pivot quickly when experiments fail
Descend
Tame the Chaos
- Stabilizing volatile innovations into reliable offerings
- Creating platforms, frameworks, or standards from proven patterns
- Noticing repeating patterns in the chaos and offering reliability, trust, and scale
Bridge
Translate the Layers
- Connecting volatility to stability
- Helping mature domains interact with experimental frontiers
- Understanding multiple layers deeply and designing translation mechanisms
If innovation adds two new layers and you haven’t moved, you’ve effectively aged. Staying relevant means knowing when and how to shift segments.
Change-Fit
We once pursued product-market fit—the alignment between what we build and what the market desires. However, we must now seek change-fit—the alignment between our internal pace and the environment we operate in.
Change-fit prompts us to consider:
- Are our planning cycles synchronized with the volatility of our domain?
- Can our teams adapt swiftly enough to the Apex or provide stability for the Base?
- Are our organizational rhythms in harmony with the pace of change in our industry?
Mismatches can lead to dysfunction. Strategic coherence requires understanding one’s internal pace and aligning with it, or consciously creating translation layers to bridge the gap between different tempos.
Strategic Archetypes
Every organization plays a role in the pyramid. Knowing yours clarifies constraints and decisions:
The Explorer
- Segment: Apex
- Strength: Speed, timing, novelty detection
- Motto: Find what’s next
- Examples: Startups, research groups, innovation labs
- Risk: High failure rate, resource burn
The Synthesizer
- Segment: Middle
- Strength: Maturation, systematization, scaling
- Motto: Make it work
- Examples: Platform teams, infrastructure vendors, established SaaS companies
- Risk: Missing breakthrough innovations, being leapfrogged
The Settler
- Segment: Base
- Strength: Stability, trust, efficiency, compliance
- Motto: Make it last
- Examples: Utilities, core infrastructure, regulated financial services
- Risk: Slow adaptation, disruption from above
The Bridge-Builder
- Segment: All layers
- Strength: Translation, integration, ecosystem thinking
- Motto: Make it connect
- Examples: Integration platforms, DevOps tools, developer ecosystems
- Risk: Complexity management, maintaining multiple relationships
Organizations naturally evolve across these archetypes. As explorer startups scale, they often transform into Synthesizers. Over time, Synthesizers may solidify into Settlers. Wise leaders anticipate these transitions and adapt organizational design.
Mapping Your Position
Key Questions:
- What layer(s) does your core product inhabit?
- Does your internal cadence match your layer’s pace of change?
- Where do your customers live on the pyramid?
- What misalignments create friction or missed opportunities?
Actions:
- Audit your technology stack and identify layer classifications
- Assess team velocity against layer requirements
- Map customer positions and their change tolerance
Identifying Movements
Key Questions:
- What Apex technologies are showing signs of stabilization?
- Where are new layers emerging that could disrupt your position?
- What foundational layers are becoming unstable or obsolete?
- Where do you see compression or expansion in the pyramid?
Actions:
- Set up systematic monitoring of adjacent layers
- Build early warning systems for disruption
- Identify bridging opportunities between segments
Aligning Operations
Key Questions:
- How should you restructure teams for your target movement?
- What feedback loops will keep you aligned with your chosen layer?
- How will you build organizational change-fit?
Actions:
- Design an organizational structure for your archetype
- Create sensing and adaptation mechanisms
- Build capabilities for your chosen movement strategy
Conclusion
The Pyramid of Change isn’t a mere metaphor; it serves as a comprehensive map of the territory you’re navigating.
While predicting the future with absolute precision may be challenging, the key lies in developing the skill of discerning and responding effectively to its ever-changing nature.
Strategy isn’t a quarterly plan; it’s a dynamic orientation to changing circumstances.
Companies that succeed will be those that build organizational change-fit—the ability to perceive their current state, comprehend their future trajectory, and navigate through various layers with purpose.
The new competitive advantage lies not in predicting the future accurately, but in being adaptable and responsive to it.
Begin by mapping your position. Identify your natural archetype. Develop sensing mechanisms. Above all, remember that in a world of constant change, the only sustainable strategy is the ability to adapt strategically.
Appendix: Current Pyramid Mapping
Emerging Apex Trends:
- Agentic AI systems and autonomous workflows
- Real-time collaborative tools with AI integration
- Edge computing and distributed AI inference
- Quantum computing applications
Descending to Middle:
- Large language model APIs and platforms
- No-code/low-code development platforms
- Digital twin technologies and frameworks
- Blockchain development frameworks
Stabilizing Base:
- Cloud computing fundamentals
- API-first architecture patterns
- DevOps and CI/CD practices
- Data privacy and security frameworks